Analysis of Domestic Violence under Islamic Criminal Law (Jināyah): A Qiṣāṣ and Taʾẓīr Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/wr1y8v96Keywords:
Jināyah Law, Domestic Violence, Qiṣāṣ, Taʾzīr, Islamic Criminal JurisprudenceAbstract
This study examines how Islamic criminal law (Jināyah) addresses domestic violence through its two principal non-Ḥudūd mechanisms, Qishash (retributive justice) and Taʾzīr (discretionary punishment). Drawing on a doctrinal approach, the research analyzes primary sources the Qur’an, Sunnah, classical fiqh treatises and contemporary scholarly fatwā literature, alongside illustrative case studies from Muslim-majority jurisdictions. It first maps the concept of domestic violence onto the Jināyah framework, distinguishing between severe physical injuries that may invoke Qishash (or its financial substitute, Diya) and the broader array of harm physical, verbal, emotional, and financial that falls under Taʾzīr. The findings reveal that Qishash is rarely applied in domestic settings except in instances of grievous bodily harm, whereas Taʾzīr accommodates both non-physical and lesser physical abuses through tailored sanctions (fines, imprisonment, counseling, or community service). However, the study also identifies significant implementation challenges sentencing inconsistency, patriarchal bias, limited judicial training, and inadequate victim support that undermine equitable outcomes. To strengthen Islamic legal responses to domestic violence, the research recommends clarifying Qishash thresholds, codifying Taʾzīr sentencing guidelines, providing specialized judicial training, and integrating interdisciplinary victim services. By harmonizing retributive and discretionary mechanisms within an ethics-infused framework of mercy and proportionality, Islamic criminal law can more effectively protect survivors, deter abuse, and promote restorative justice.References
Aseere, S. (2019). The position of Islam on domestic violence against women with particular reference to southern Saudi Arabia. University of Birmingham.
Ashfaq, M. M., & Al Azhari, M. A. (2019). A Religio-Legal Discourse of Mercy for Justice: A Qur’ānic Response to the Western Critics. Journal of Religious Studies, 3(1), 67–102.
Barnett, O. W., Miller-Perrin, C. L., & Perrin, R. D. (2010). Family violence across the lifespan: An introduction. Sage.
Bone, R. G. (2006). Who Decides-A Critical Look at Procedural Discretion. Cardozo L. Rev., 28, 1961.
Buzawa, E. S., & Buzawa, C. G. (2003). Domestic violence: The criminal justice response. Sage.
Buzawa, E. S., Buzawa, C. G., & Stark, E. D. (2015). Responding to domestic violence: The integration of criminal justice and human services. Sage Publications.
Chaudhry, A. S. (2013). Domestic violence and the Islamic tradition. OUP Oxford.
Dutton, D. G. (2011). Rethinking domestic violence. Ubc Press.
García-Moreno, C., Zimmerman, C., Morris-Gehring, A., Heise, L., Amin, A., Abrahams, N., Montoya, O., Bhate-Deosthali, P., Kilonzo, N., & Watts, C. (2015). Addressing violence against women: a call to action. The Lancet, 385(9978), 1685–1695.
Gill, A. (2004). Voicing the silent fear: South Asian women’s experiences of domestic violence. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(5), 465–483.
Hajjar, L. (2004). Religion, state power, and domestic violence in Muslim societies: A framework for comparative analysis. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(1), 1–38.
Healy, D. (2019). Exploring victims’ interactions with the criminal justice system. Ireland Department of Justice and Equality Report.
Julve, S. M. G. (2019). Risk-Taking Activism: Counter-Spaces Against Public Sexual Violence in Post-January 25 Egypt. Rutgers The State University of New Jersey, School of Graduate Studies.
Kamali, M. H. (2019). Crime and punishment in Islamic law: A fresh interpretation. Oxford University Press.
Kamaruzaman, N. A. F. B. (2020). Reconstructing the Theory of Ḥudūd and Its Application within the Malaysian Legal Framework: A Case Study of the Syariah Criminal Code (II) 1993, State of Kelantan. University of Leeds.
Nafees, S. M. M. (2020). An Introduction to the Divine Criminal Justice System. Minarah Publications.
Nakku, C. (2016). Investigation of library user perceptions towards mobile phone-based library services case study: Islamic University in Uganda. Uganda Martyrs University.
Pietilä, A.-M., Nurmi, S.-M., Halkoaho, A., & Kyngäs, H. (2019). Qualitative research: Ethical considerations. In The application of content analysis in nursing science research (pp. 49–69). Springer.
Rosen, L. (2000). The justice of Islam: comparative perspectives on Islamic law and society. Oxford University Press.
Scheffler, T. (2002). The Radicalism of the Powerless: Imaginations of Violence in Three Religious Traditions. na.
Shafqat, M. (n.d.). 130404253 University of London “Does the concept of Qisas and Diyat in Sharia Law omits to provide justice for victims of Honor Killings?”
Snowden, F. M. (2008). Emerging and reemerging diseases: a historical perspective. Immunological Reviews, 225(1), 9–26.
Yusuf, M. Y., & Bahari, Z. B. (2015). Islamic corporate social responsibility in Islamic banking: Towards poverty alleviation. Ethics, Governance and Regulation in Islamic Finance, 73(5), 92–99.
Zahraa, M. (2003). Unique Islamic law methodology and the validity of modern legal and social science research methods for Islamic research. Arab LQ, 18, 215.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dillah Afriyanti, Jihan Fahira, Ahmad Prasetyo (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.