Analysis of the Relevance of Hudud Punishment in the Context of Law Enforcement in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/ym5ehj17Keywords:
Hudud Punishment, Islamic Criminal Law, Indonesian Legal System, Sharia Implementation, Constitutional CompatibilityAbstract
This research explores the relevance and implications of implementing Hudud punishment within the framework of Indonesia’s legal system. Hudud, as prescribed in Islamic law, refers to fixed punishments for specific crimes such as theft, adultery, and apostasy, derived from the Quran and Hadith. While Hudud holds strong theological foundations and historical precedence in various Islamic countries, its application in Indonesia a nation characterized by religious pluralism, constitutional democracy, and adherence to international human rights norms presents a complex legal and sociopolitical challenge. Through normative legal research methods and qualitative analysis, this study examines the compatibility of Hudud with Indonesia’s constitutional principles, national criminal law, and the broader societal context. The study also analyzes the partial implementation of Sharia in Aceh province as a case study, alongside public opinion and academic debates surrounding the issue. Findings reveal significant constitutional, procedural, and human rights concerns that limit the viability of Hudud punishments at the national level. While religious sentiments may support its moral intent, the legal, social, and political landscape of Indonesia suggests that Hudud punishment is not practically or ethically aligned with the nation's current legal and democratic framework. This research contributes to the ongoing discourse on Islamic law, legal reform, and religious pluralism in Indonesia, highlighting the need for balanced, inclusive approaches to lawmaking that respect both religious values and constitutional commitments.
References
Abou El Fadl, K. (2016). Islamic law, human rights and neo-colonialism. In ‘War on terror’ (pp. 193–222). Manchester University Press.
Alam, M. K. (2021). A systematic qualitative case study: questions, data collection, NVivo analysis and saturation. Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal, 16(1), 1–31.
Alsoufi, R. H. A. (2012). Strategies for the justifications of Ḥudūd Allah and their punishments in the Islamic tradition.
Bader, V. (2003). Religious diversity and democratic institutional pluralism. Political Theory, 31(2), 265–294.
Baderin, M. A. (2003). International human rights and Islamic law. OUP Oxford.
Benton, L. (2002). Law and colonial cultures: Legal regimes in world history, 1400-1900. Cambridge University Press.
Cammack, M. (2015). The punishment of Islamic sex crimes in a modern legal system: The Islamic Qanun of Aceh, Indonesia. Sw. L. Rev., 45, 595.
Derichs, C., & Fleschenberg, A. (2010). Religious fundamentalisms and their gendered impacts in Asia. Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Department for Asia and the Pacific.
Gabriel, M. A. (2016). Reforming Hudud ordinances to reconcile Islamic criminal law with international human rights law.
Hainsworth, G. (2007). Rule of law, anti‐corruption, anti‐terrorism and militant Islam: Coping with threats to democratic pluralism and national unity in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 48(1), 128–144.
Hefner, R. W. (2017). Christians, conflict, and citizenship in Muslim-majority Indonesia. The Review of Faith & International Affairs, 15(1), 91–101.
Huis, S. C. van. (2015). Islamic courts and women’s divorce rights in Indonesia: The cases of Cianjur and Bulukumba. Universiteit Leiden.
Kendhammer, B. (2013). The Sharia controversy in Northern Nigeria and the politics of Islamic law in new and uncertain democracies. Comparative Politics, 45(3), 291–311.
Kersten, C. (2015). Islam in Indonesia: the contest for society, ideas and values. Oxford University Press.
Korbatieh, S. (2019). The law of evidence in the Islamic criminal justice system: a critical appraisal in the light of modern technology. Macquarie University.
Lau, M. (2016). The Re-Islamization of Legal Systems. In The Ashgate Research Companion to Islamic Law (pp. 235–246). Routledge.
Lippman, M. (2017). Islamic criminal law and procedure: religious fundamentalism v. modern law. In Issues in Islamic Law (pp. 347–380). Routledge.
McGibbon, R. (2004). Secessionist challenges in Aceh and Papua: Is special autonomy the solution?
McKenna, J. M., Martinez-Prather, K., & Bowman, S. W. (2016). The roles of school-based law enforcement officers and how these roles are established: A qualitative study. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 27(4), 420–443.
Neuman, G. L. (2002). Human rights and constitutional rights: Harmony and dissonance. Stan. L. Rev., 55, 1863.
Petrova, E., Dewing, J., & Camilleri, M. (2016). Confidentiality in participatory research: Challenges from one study. Nursing Ethics, 23(4), 442–454.
Sachedina, A. (2009). Islam and the challenge of human rights. Oxford University Press.
Salim, A. (2008). Challenging the secular state: The Islamization of law in modern Indonesia. University of Hawaii Press.
Siregar, H. B. (2008). Lessons Learned from the Implementation of Islamic Shari’ah Criminal Law in Aceh, Indonesia. Journal of Law and Religion, 24(1), 143–176.
Van Esch, P., & Van Esch, L. (2013). Justification of a qualitative methodology to investigate the emerging concept: The dimensions of religion as underpinning constructs for mass media social marketing campaigns. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 1(2), 214–243.
White, M. D., Marsh, E. E., Marsh, E. E., & White, M. D. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.
Zubaida, S. (2003). Law and power in the Islamic world.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Basyira Syadza Chayra, Dalilatul Zahratussalamah (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
