Analysis of Islamic Law on the Practice of Siri Marriage in the Digital Era: Legal, Social, and Policy Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/29t0rg67Keywords:
Siri Marriage, Islamic Law, Digital Era, Legal Recognition, Policy GapsAbstract
This research examines the practice of Siri marriage within the framework of Islamic law, focusing specifically on its adaptation and challenges in the digital era. Siri marriage, a form of informal, unregistered marriage that does not involve official state documentation, has existed for centuries in various Islamic societies. However, the rapid growth of digital platforms and online communication technologies has created new avenues for conducting marriages that may not align with traditional legal and religious practices. This study analyzes the validity of Siri marriage under Islamic law in the context of modern technology, highlighting the legal, social, and ethical implications of digital marriages. Through a combination of literature review and case analysis, the research explores the risks and consequences of Siri marriages conducted through digital means, particularly concerning gender equality, legal recognition, and the protection of individual rights. It further investigates the policy and legal gaps that exist in many countries regarding digital unions and identifies the need for legal reforms and clearer guidelines to bridge the gap between traditional Islamic marriage practices and modern civil law. The study concludes that while Siri marriages retain validity within Islamic law, their digital adaptation poses significant challenges in terms of legal protections, marital rights, and social accountability. It calls for comprehensive policy changes, awareness campaigns, and interfaith collaboration to ensure that the institution of marriage remains just and equitable in the digital age.
References
Al-Saqaf, W., & Seidler, N. (2017). Blockchain technology for social impact: opportunities and challenges ahead. Journal of Cyber Policy, 2(3), 338–354.
Alfitri. (2015). Whose Authority? Contesting and Negotiating the Idea of a Legitimate Interpretation of Islamic Law in Indonesia. AsJCL, 10, 191.
Alfitri, A. (2020). Protecting women from domestic violence: Islam, family law, and the state in Indonesia. Studia Islamika, 27(2), 273–307.
Amirulkamar, S. (2013). Turnitin Artikel Administration Reagent of Aceh Family Law Qanun: Siri Marriage Motives Towards the Legality of Polygyny.
Bedner, A., & Van Huis, S. (2010). Plurality of marriage law and marriage registration for Muslims in Indonesia: a plea for pragmatism. Utrecht Law Review, 6(2).
Boden, M. A. (2018). Artificial intelligence: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
Brake, E. (2012). Minimizing marriage: Marriage, morality, and the law. Oxford University Press.
Brescia, R. H. (2020). Social Change and the Associational Self: Protecting the Integrity and Identity and Democracy in the Digital Age. Penn St. L. Rev., 125, 773.
Byrne, A., & Carr, D. (2005). Caught in the cultural lag: The stigma of singlehood. Psychological Inquiry, 16(2/3), 84–91.
Fair, F. B. (n.d.). SEASONAL UPDATE.
Griffin, D., & Stacey, R. (2006). A Complexity Perspective on Researching Organisations: taking experience seriously. Routledge.
Hertlein, K. M., & Blumer, M. L. C. (2013). The couple and family technology framework: Intimate relationships in a digital age. Routledge.
Himawan, K. K., Bambling, M., & Edirippulige, S. (2018). The Asian single profiles: Discovering many faces of never married adults in Asia. Journal of Family Issues, 39(14), 3667–3689.
Kayadibi, S. (2019). Istihsan: The doctrine of juristic preference in Islamic law. The Other Press.
Lathifah Munawaroh, A. M., & Rofiq, A. (2016). Disharmony of Sirri Marriage Registration Regulation on the Family Card (Analyzing The Ministry of Interior Affairs’ Regulation No. 9/2016).
Leng, C. H., Jones, G. W., & Mohamad, M. (2009). Muslim-non-Muslim marriage, rights and the state in Southeast Asia. Muslim-Non-Muslim Marriage: Political and Cultural Contestations in Southeast Asia, 1–29.
Manderson, L., & Bennett, L. R. (2003). Violence against women in Asian societies. Psychology Press.
Memon, A. A., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2003). Psychology and law: Truthfulness, accuracy and credibility. John Wiley & Sons.
Muhammadin, F. (2020). Fiqh Al-Jihād In The Contemporary World: Addressing The Gaps In The Regulations On The Means And Methods Of Warfare.
Nightingale, D. S., & Rossman, S. B. (2015). Collecting data in the field. Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation, 445–473.
Omar, S. (2014). Marriage in Islam: life partnership or discriminatory family set up? An analysis of some protective legal and moral Shariah provisions for women with special reference to Surah An-Nisa. An Analysis of Some Protective Legal and Moral Shariah Provisions for Women with Special Reference to Surah An-Nisa (September 5, 2014).
Pais, M. S. (2002). Birth registration: right from the start. UNICEF Innocenti Digest, 9, 1–32.
Ramadan, H. M. (2006). Understanding Islamic law: from classical to contemporary. Rowman Altamira.
Raquib, A. (2015). Islamic ethics of technology: An objectives’(Maqasid) approach. The Other Press.
Rosen, L. (2000). The justice of Islam: comparative perspectives on Islamic law and society. Oxford University Press.
Solove, D. J., & Hoofnagle, C. J. (2006). A model regime of privacy protection. U. Ill. L. Rev., 357.
Susskind, J. (2018). Future politics: Living together in a world transformed by tech. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Bimo Abisatya, Gentala Prasetyo (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
