Legal pluralism in contemporary societies: Dynamics of interaction between islamic law and secular civil law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35335/cfb3wk76Keywords:
Coexistence, Governance, Islamic law, Legal pluralism, Secular civil lawAbstract
Legal pluralism refers to the simultaneous existence of different legal systems in a single community. This presents intricate challenges and opportunities for governance, justice, and social cohesion in many socio-cultural settings. This study examines the interplay between Islamic law (Sharia) and secular civil law in modern nations, specifically aiming to comprehend the intricacies, conflicts, and consequences of legal pluralism. This study does a thorough literature analysis to analyze existing scholarship on legal pluralism. It synthesizes important findings and perspectives from many geographical places that have significant Muslim populations. The review emphasizes the complex and diverse nature of legal pluralism, which involves the coexistence, competition, and accommodation of various legal traditions. Furthermore, it recognizes the difficulties that arise from conflicts between Islamic law and secular civil law, such as differences in rights and safeguards, tensions based on religion and cultural differences, and obstacles to efficient government and societal unity. Moreover, the review examines the wider consequences of legal pluralism on academic research, policy-making, and practical implementation. It proposes potential areas for future research to enhance our comprehension of the dynamics of legal pluralism and to guide efforts in fostering inclusivity, fairness, and appreciation for diversity within legal systems. This research adds to the continuous efforts of building inclusive and equitable legal systems that defend human rights, develop social cohesion, and promote justice for all individuals by recognizing the diversity of legal traditions and viewpoints within modern cultures.
Research Highlights:
- Complex Dynamics of Legal Pluralism: The research elucidates the multifaceted nature of legal pluralism, examining the coexistence, competition, and accommodation between Islamic law and secular civil law in diverse socio-cultural contexts. By synthesizing existing scholarship, the study provides a comprehensive understanding of the complexities and tensions inherent in legal pluralism dynamics.
- Challenges and Implications: The study identifies key challenges arising from conflicts between Islamic law and secular civil law, including disparities in rights and protections, tensions along religious and cultural lines, and impediments to effective governance and social cohesion. These insights shed light on the broader implications of legal pluralism for governance, justice, and social cohesion within contemporary societies.
- Policy and Practice Recommendations: By exploring the broader implications of legal pluralism for scholarship, policy, and practice, the research offers valuable recommendations for promoting inclusivity, equity, and respect for diversity within legal frameworks. These recommendations inform strategies for addressing challenges and fostering inclusive legal systems that uphold human rights and equality for all individuals.
References
Alidadi, K., Foblets, M.-C., & Müller, D. (2022). Introduction: The Search for Justice in Plural Societies: The Opportunities and Pitfalls of Accommodative Law and Practices. In Redesigning Justice for Plural Societies (pp. 1–17). Routledge.
Alkubaisy, A. (2023). A critical analysis of the continued relevance of secularism to contemporary Islamic states’ attitudes to international human rights law. Anglia Ruskin Research Online (ARRO).
Arabi, O. (2021). Studies in modern Islamic law and jurisprudence. In Studies in Modern Islamic Law and Jurisprudence. Brill.
Asasriwarnia, A., & Jandra, M. (2018). Comparison Of Legal System: Islamic Law System, Civil Law, and Common Law. UMRAN-International Journal of Islamic and Civilizational Studies, 5(2–1).
Ayoub, S. A. (2022). A Theory of a State? How Civil Law Ended Legal Pluralism in Modern Egypt. Journal of Law and Religion, 37(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2021.79
Badu, E., O’Brien, A. P., & Mitchell, R. (2019). An integrative review on methodological considerations in mental health research–design, sampling, data collection procedure and quality assurance. Archives of Public Health, 77, 1–15.
Bajaj, A., & Sangwan, O. P. (2019). A systematic literature review of test case prioritization using genetic algorithms. Ieee Access, 7, 126355–126375.
Benda-Beckmann, K. von, & Turner, B. (2018). Legal pluralism, social theory, and the state. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 50(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2018.1532674
Berman, P. S. (2018). Global legal pluralism as a normative project. UC Irvine L. Rev., 8, 149.
Booth, A., Noyes, J., Flemming, K., Gerhardus, A., Wahlster, P., van der Wilt, G. J., Mozygemba, K., Refolo, P., Sacchini, D., & Tummers, M. (2018). Structured methodology review identified seven (RETREAT) criteria for selecting qualitative evidence synthesis approaches. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 99, 41–52.
Boukhatem, J., & Moussa, F. Ben. (2018). The effect of Islamic banks on GDP growth: Some evidence from selected MENA countries. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(3), 231–247.
Bramer, W. M., De Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 106(4), 531.
Cooper, C., Booth, A., Varley-Campbell, J., Britten, N., & Garside, R. (2018). Defining the process to literature searching in systematic reviews: a literature review of guidance and supporting studies. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 1–14.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V, & Valentine, J. C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. Russell Sage Foundation.
Cvetkovich, A. (2018). Articulating the global and the local: Globalization and cultural studies. Routledge.
DE PASQUAL, L. (2022). THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE CHALLENGE OF POST-SECULARISM: AN ANALYSIS OF THE JURISPRUDENCE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON RELIGIOUS DISCRIMINATION IN THE WORKPLACE [Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore]. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/122310
Durham Jr, W. C., & Scharffs, B. G. (2019). Law and religion: National, international, and comparative perspectives. Aspen Publishing.
Ferrari, S., Wonisch, K., & Medda-Windischer, R. (2021). Tying the Knot: A Holistic Approach to the Enhancement of Religious Minority Rights and Freedom of Religion. In Religions (Vol. 12, Issue 9, p. 689). MDPI.
Fink, A. (2019). Conducting research literature reviews: From the internet to paper. Sage publications.
Fraser, J. (2020). Social Institutions and International Human Rights Law: Every Organ of Society. Cambridge University Press.
Fredman, S. (2018). Comparative human rights law. Oxford University Press.
GENÇ, S. Y., & Hassan, S. (2019). Quranic Principles of Universal Law on the Quranic Exegesis. Bilimname, 2019(39), 165–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28949/bilimname.592756
Gómez, S., Carreño, A., & Lloret, J. (2021). Cultural heritage and environmental ethical values in governance models: Conflicts between recreational fisheries and other maritime activities in Mediterranean marine protected areas. Marine Policy, 129, 104529.
Greco, S., Ishizaka, A., Tasiou, M., & Torrisi, G. (2019). On the methodological framework of composite indices: A review of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness. Social Indicators Research, 141, 61–94.
Gusenbauer, M., & Haddaway, N. R. (2020). Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(2), 181–217.
Haghani, M. (2023). What makes an informative and publication-worthy scientometric analysis of literature: a guide for authors, reviewers and editors. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 22, 100956.
Harrison, R. L., Reilly, T. M., & Creswell, J. W. (2020). Methodological rigor in mixed methods: An application in management studies. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 473–495.
Hirschl, R., & Shachar, A. (2018). Competing Orders: The Challenge of Religion to Modern Constitutionalism. U. Chi. L. Rev., 85, 425.
Howard-Hassmann, R. E. (2018). In Defense of Universal Human Rights. John Wiley & Sons.
Ife, J., Soldatić, K., & Briskman, L. (2022). Human rights and social work. Cambridge University Press.
Jinping, X. (2022). Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects. Report at the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China. Qiu Shi, 21.
Lessing, B., & Willis, G. D. (2019). Legitimacy in criminal governance: Managing a drug empire from behind bars. American Political Science Review, 113(2), 584–606.
Levni, V., & Çelik, S. (2023). Legal Pluralism Theories and Their Position in Islamic Law. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(2), 1315–1352.
Lukianov, D. V, Ponomarova, H. P., & Tahiiev, A. S. (2020). The Quran in Shia jurisprudence. J Nation Acad Leg Sci Ukr, 27(4), 29–42.
Macaulay, S. (2020). The real and the paper deal: empirical pictures of relationships, complexity and the urge for transparent simple rules. Stewart Macaulay: Selected Works, 415–456.
Maher, C., Hadfield, M., Hutchings, M., & De Eyto, A. (2018). Ensuring rigor in qualitative data analysis: A design research approach to coding combining NVivo with traditional material methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918786362.
McDougal, M. S., Lasswell, H. D., & Chen, L. (2018). Human rights and world public order: the basic policies of an international law of human dignity. Oxford University Press.
Michelon, G., Sealy, R., & Trojanowski, G. (2020). Understanding research findings and evidence on corporate reporting: An independent literature review.
Mokkink, L. B., Boers, M., Van Der Vleuten, C. P. M., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., De Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2020). COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20, 1–13.
Muhajir, M., Nisa, I. S., Munawar, A., & Karimullah, S. S. (2023). Agus Moh Najib’s Thoughts on the Interconnection of Islamic Law and National Law. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 21(1), 86–103.
Mukaddam, F. (2024). Contextualising Legal Pluralism. In Muslim Women between Community and Individual Rights: Legal Pluralism and Marriage in South Africa (pp. 23–43). Springer.
Mukhammadolim, M. (2019). Problems of regulation of secularism and religious principles in Arab countries. Bulletin Social-Economic and Humanitarian Research, 4 (6), 114–122.
Nampewo, Z., Mike, J. H., & Wolff, J. (2022). Respecting, protecting and fulfilling the human right to health. International Journal for Equity in Health, 21(1), 36.
Nasir, M. A. (2022). Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law. Mazahib Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 21(2), 155–186.
Noyes, J., Booth, A., Flemming, K., Garside, R., Harden, A., Lewin, S., Pantoja, T., Hannes, K., Cargo, M., & Thomas, J. (2018). Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group guidance series—paper 3: methods for assessing methodological limitations, data extraction and synthesis, and confidence in synthesized qualitative findings. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 97, 49–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.06.020
Pieterse, J. N. (2019). Globalization and culture: Global mélange. Rowman & Littlefield.
Powell, E. J. (2022). Complexity and dissonance: Islamic law states and the international order. International Studies Review, 24(1), viac001.
Purkon, A. (2022). Rethinking of contemporary Islamic law methodology: Critical study of Muhammad Shahrūr’s thinking on Islamic law sources. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 78(4).
Ramaioli, F. L. (2024). Juridical Perspectives Between Islam and the West: A Tale of Two Worlds. Springer Nature.
Ramdani, A., Raji, R., & Ahmad, M. K. (2024). Exploring the concept and the communication principles of negotiation among Islamic corporate organizations. Journal of Islamic Marketing.
Ruffin, F. (2019). Land governance in the context of legal pluralism: Cases of Ghana and Kenya. Trajectory of Land Reform in Post-Colonial African States: The Quest for Sustainable Development and Utilization, 91–108.
Rumkel, L., Sam, B., & Umanailo, M. C. B. (2019). Village head partnership, village consultative body and customary institution in village development. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Res, 8(8), 1058–1063.
Saeed, A. (2018). Human rights and Islam: An introduction to key debates between Islamic law and international human rights law. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sahin, A. (2018). Critical issues in Islamic education studies: Rethinking Islamic and Western liberal secular values of education. Religions, 9(11), 335.
Salam, R. (2023). Cultural Diversity in Public Administration: Understanding the Implications of Government Science Theories for Multicultural Management. Khazanah Sosial, 5(4), 647–660.
Sani, H. B. A. (2020). State law and legal pluralism: towards an appraisal. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 52(1), 82–109.
Sarib, S., & Mokodenseho, S. (2023). Comparison Between Islamic Law and Positive Law in a Judicial Context. West Science Islamic Studies, 1(01), 34–41.
Schachner, M. K. (2019). From equality and inclusion to cultural pluralism–Evolution and effects of cultural diversity perspectives in schools. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16(1), 1–17.
Schoen, S. A., Lane, S. J., Mailloux, Z., May‐Benson, T., Parham, L. D., Smith Roley, S., & Schaaf, R. C. (2019). A systematic review of ayres sensory integration intervention for children with autism. Autism Research, 12(1), 6–19.
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.
Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., & Sorrell, S. (2018). Promoting novelty, rigor, and style in energy social science: Towards codes of practice for appropriate methods and research design. Energy Research & Social Science, 45, 12–42.
Sullivan, D. (2018). The public/private distinction in international human rights law. In Women’s Rights, Human Rights (pp. 126–134). Routledge.
Sun, Y., Zhang, Y., Gwizdka, J., & Trace, C. B. (2019). Consumer evaluation of the quality of online health information: systematic literature review of relevant criteria and indicators. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(5), e12522.
Sunstein, C. R. (2018). Legal reasoning and political conflict. Oxford University Press.
Swenson, G. (2018). Legal pluralism in theory and practice. International Studies Review, 20(3), 438–462. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix060
Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal pluralism explained: History, theory, consequences. Oxford University Press, USA.
Terwee, C. B., Prinsen, C. A. C., Chiarotto, A., Westerman, M. J., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Bouter, L. M., De Vet, H. C. W., & Mokkink, L. B. (2018). COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Quality of Life Research, 27, 1159–1170.
Thirlway, H. (2019). The sources of international law. Oxford University Press.
Thontowi, J., Ady, W. S., Rahmawati, N. D., & Ali, M. (2023). Prophetic Law and Social Engineering: The Interaction between Religious Legal System and Customary Local System in Respect to Maintain and Promote Religious Values in Indonesian National Legal System. International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics (SINOMICS JOURNAL), 1(6), 761–778.
Tobi, H., & Kampen, J. K. (2018). Research design: the methodology for interdisciplinary research framework. Quality & Quantity, 52, 1209–1225.
Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. John Wiley & Sons.
Woulfe, F., Fadahunsi, K. P., Smith, S., Chirambo, G. B., Larsson, E., Henn, P., Mawkin, M., & O’Donoghue, J. (2021). Identification and evaluation of methodologies to assess the quality of mobile health apps in high-, low-, and middle-income countries: rapid review. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(10), e28384.
Yanto, O., Darusman, Y. M., Susanto, S., & Harapan, A. D. (2020). Legal protection of the rights of the child victims in Indonesian juvenile criminal justice system. Jurnal Yustika: Media Hukum Dan Keadilan, 23(01), 24–35.
Yilmaz, I. (2019). Nation building, Islamic law and unofficial legal pluralism: The cases of Turkey and Pakistan. In Legal pluralism in Muslim contexts (pp. 109–138). Brill. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004398269_007
Yilmaz, I. (2023). Muslim Secularism by Conduct: Attitudes of Young Australian Muslims to Legal Pluralism and Sharia. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 44(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2022.2104826
Zhang, J. (2019). Educational diversity and ethnic cultural heritage in the process of globalization. International Journal of Anthropology and Ethnology, 3(1), 7.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Sahin Husain, Nasir Purkon Ayoub, Mukhammadolim Hassmann (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
