Islamic Law Analysis of PayLater Contracts in Online Marketplace Applications

Authors

  • Bhanurasmi Bhanurasmi Universitas Nurul Jadid Probolinggo, Indonesia Author
  • Gyandra Fisnawati Universitas Nurul Jadid Probolinggo, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35335/qs105330

Keywords:

Islamic Law, PayLater, Fintech, Sharia Compliance, Online Marketplace

Abstract

The rapid development of financial technology (fintech) has led to the widespread adoption of Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) or PayLater services in major online marketplaces such as Shopee, Tokopedia, and Lazada. These services offer consumers flexible payment options by allowing deferred payments without immediate full settlement. However, from an Islamic law perspective, concerns arise regarding the compliance of such contracts with Sharia principles. This research aims to analyze the structure, terms, and mechanisms of PayLater contracts based on Islamic jurisprudence, particularly focusing on the prohibition of riba (interest), gharar (uncertainty), and zulm (injustice or exploitation). The study uses a qualitative normative approach with content analysis of PayLater agreements and Sharia legal principles, supported by expert opinions and existing fatwas. The findings indicate that most current PayLater models contain non-compliant elements, particularly in the form of interest-based late fees and lack of contractual transparency. This research proposes alternative Sharia-compliant financing models such as murabahah, ijarah, and qardh hasan that can replace conventional PayLater mechanisms. The study concludes that greater regulatory oversight, ethical system design, and consumer education are essential to ensure the development of fintech products that align with the values of Islamic finance and protect Muslim consumers from engaging in impermissible transactions.

References

Akhtar, R. C. (2013). British muslims and transformative processes of the Islamic legal traditions: Negotiating law, culture and religion with specific reference to Islamic family law and faith based alternative dispute resolution. University of Warwick.

Alhusban, A. A. A., Massadeh, A. A. M., & Haloush, H. (2021). The Islamic credit card as an electronic payment method: the technical trick in the installment payment contract as a financial product. International Journal of Law and Management, 63(6), 599–628.

Allie, S. (2020). Exploring the concept of conciliation (ṣulḥ) as a method of alternative dispute resolution in Islamic law.

Chowdhury, M. A. F. (2015). Why Islamic finance is different? A short review of Islamic jurisprudential interpretation about usury, ambiguity (Gharar), gambling (Maysir) and exploitative commercial arbitrage (Talaqi alRukban). Journal of Emerging Economies and Islamic Research, 3(3), 69–83.

Elasrag, H. (2019). Blockchain and its applications on Islamic finance. Hussein Elasrag.

Farooq, M. O. (2015). Islamic finance and debt culture: treading the conventional path? International Journal of Social Economics, 42(12), 1168–1195.

Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge University Press.

Gomber, P., Koch, J.-A., & Siering, M. (2017). Digital Finance and FinTech: current research and future research directions. Journal of Business Economics, 87, 537–580.

Haider, M. (2018). Shari’ah-Compliant Solutions to Ah Long Syndicates: Promoting Gender Equality and Financial Integrity in Islamic Nations.

Halayqa, H. A. I. (2019). Islamic Finance and Financial Stability, in Theory and Practice. Hamad Bin Khalifa University (Qatar).

Heald, D. (2012). Why is transparency about public expenditure so elusive? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 30–49.

Izberk-Bilgin, E. (2012). Infidel brands: Unveiling alternative meanings of global brands at the nexus of globalization, consumer culture, and Islamism. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 663–687.

Liu, F. H. M., & Lai, K. P. Y. (2021). Ecologies of green finance: Green sukuk and development of green Islamic finance in Malaysia. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 53(8), 1896–1914.

Mann, R. J. (2005). Contracting for credit. Mich. L. Rev., 104, 899.

Mullen, J., & Davison, R. P. (2019). Evaluating contract claims. John Wiley & Sons.

Nienhaus, V. (2020). The Future of Islamic Finance after the Corona Crisis. Bait Al-Mashura Journal, 13.

Omar Farooq, M. (2012). Exploitation, profit and the riba‐interest reductionism. International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management, 5(4), 292–320.

Ramady, M. A. (2021). Financial Regulation and Liberation: Saudi Arabia’s Path towards True Global Partnership. Springer Nature.

Saiti, B., Abdul Wahab, H., & Ahmad, K. (2016). Contracts, structures, and computation mechanisms of Islamic bank retail financing products: A critical assessment. In Islamic Banking: Growth, Stability and Inclusion (pp. 81–125). Springer.

Sarwono, J., & Jusuf, D. I. (2015). Indonesian E-Commerce Revolution during the Era of Disruption. October. Sequeira, AH (2018). Prof. Aloysius Sequeira* Priyanka John Attupuram** Sivakumar Gopalakrishnan, 1–56.

Smits, J. M. (2021). Contract law: a comparative introduction. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Stipanowich, T. J. (2001). Contract and conflict management. Wis. L. Rev., 831.

Sutikno, B., Sanjaya, M. D., Hanamaria, S. J., & Xaveria, V. (2019). Tokopedia: Dissecting the unicorn marketplace’s magic for national domination.

Tektona, R. I. (2021). Legal Protection of Creditors in Financing Agreements through Digital Credit Services (Paylater). Jurnal Hukum Islam, 19(2), 233–252.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Islamic Law Analysis of PayLater Contracts in Online Marketplace Applications. (2024). SYARIAT: Akhwal Syaksiyah, Jinayah, Siyasah and Muamalah, 1(3), 132-139. https://doi.org/10.35335/qs105330

Similar Articles

1-10 of 28

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.